CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > CONVERGE

Should I do multi cycles test when using RANS model ?

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   January 12, 2017, 04:31
Smile Should I do multi cycles test when using RANS model ?
  #1
New Member
 
Shen shiquan
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: The State Key Laboratory of Engines (Tianjin University)
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 10
tju_shq is on a distinguished road
Hello everyone, As the title says I am doing a simulation of two-stroke marine diesel engine by using RANS k-ε model ,when I run my case in 14 cycles ,I found some output data such as swirl ratio ,TKE and EPS in the cylinder vary with the cycles. Especially the first cycle has great difference with the later cycles. The question is : if i want to analyze the velocity field in the cylinder ,should I do simulation of multi cycles and just pick one stable cycle in the last or do average of the last stable cycles? PS: I use RANS K-ε model in the Converge .


I am looking forward to your reply,thanks
tju_shq is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 12, 2017, 12:10
Default
  #2
Member
 
jlemoine's Avatar
 
Jerome Le Moine
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Convergent Science, Madison WI
Posts: 50
Rep Power: 10
jlemoine is on a distinguished road
Shen shiquan,

Thank you for your question. For gasoline cases, it is very common that the initial conditions play an important role in the results of the first cycles. So we recommend running at least 3 cycles in order to obtain solutions that are independent of the initial conditions. From the plot of the swirl ratio, it seems after the second cycle the solution remains unchanged from one cycle to the other. For your study, you could pick results from one cycle after the second cycle or you could average the results from cycle 3 to the last cycle. The most accurate way will be the last of the two options.
__________________
Jerome Le Moine
Support/Application Engineer
CONVERGECFD
jlemoine is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 12, 2017, 21:34
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Shen shiquan
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: The State Key Laboratory of Engines (Tianjin University)
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 10
tju_shq is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by jlemoine View Post
Shen shiquan,

Thank you for your question. For gasoline cases, it is very common that the initial conditions play an important role in the results of the first cycles. So we recommend running at least 3 cycles in order to obtain solutions that are independent of the initial conditions. From the plot of the swirl ratio, it seems after the second cycle the solution remains unchanged from one cycle to the other. For your study, you could pick results from one cycle after the second cycle or you could average the results from cycle 3 to the last cycle. The most accurate way will be the last of the two options.
Thanks very much for your reply ,

But another question is: if i want to analyze the velocity field in the cylinder ,should I do average of 3D data files from different and stable cycles ? or just pick one cycle's 3D output files for analysis ?

PS: I use RANS K-ε model ,not LES model.
tju_shq is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 13, 2017, 10:47
Default
  #4
Member
 
jlemoine's Avatar
 
Jerome Le Moine
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Convergent Science, Madison WI
Posts: 50
Rep Power: 10
jlemoine is on a distinguished road
In your case, I would average the 3D data files from different and stable cycles because you have the data available to you. Even if you are running with RANS k-epsilon model, there may be some small variations in velocity field so the most accurate way is to average the 3D data over multiple engine cycles.
__________________
Jerome Le Moine
Support/Application Engineer
CONVERGECFD
jlemoine is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 13, 2017, 20:58
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Shen shiquan
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: The State Key Laboratory of Engines (Tianjin University)
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 10
tju_shq is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by jlemoine View Post
In your case, I would average the 3D data files from different and stable cycles because you have the data available to you. Even if you are running with RANS k-epsilon model, there may be some small variations in velocity field so the most accurate way is to average the 3D data over multiple engine cycles.
Thanks for your help
tju_shq is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 21, 2017, 09:51
Default
  #6
Senior Member
 
Tobias
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Germany
Posts: 284
Rep Power: 11
MFGT is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by jlemoine View Post
In your case, I would average the 3D data files from different and stable cycles because you have the data available to you. Even if you are running with RANS k-epsilon model, there may be some small variations in velocity field so the most accurate way is to average the 3D data over multiple engine cycles.
How do I average the 3D data?

Regarding the Main Question:

So far the max. number of cycles of a singel simulation i have ran were 5. But, during the setup i spend a lot of time to check how much fuel i need to add premixed into the intake port, to match the target Lambda with the first cycle. I am working with DI and PFI gasoline models, using RNG k-e model.

PFI is more difficult of course. There i run 1 cycle (-540 to +180), than map the spray, wallfilm and flow field of the intake port region only. Than basically rerun the case and thats my new 1st cycle. Then i continue with restart mapping from +180 BDC.

About your plot, i would say you should check the initial conditions. The first cycle looks way too different.
MFGT is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 30, 2017, 21:49
Default
  #7
New Member
 
Michael Cao
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
Michael Cao is on a distinguished road
If you want to average the 3D data,you need to write your own matlab program ,may be u can get these programs from your partners who is doing LES simulation, because they need to do average from different cycles. Good luck
Michael Cao is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2D RANS Model? wanted2105 Main CFD Forum 0 July 15, 2016 16:44
RANS model Cris2015 Main CFD Forum 11 September 11, 2015 06:58
RANS simulation of Caradonna blade model deeps SU2 4 July 10, 2014 08:07
using interface with Euler multi phase model karimi Main CFD Forum 0 May 22, 2011 02:39
RANS model for near wake region frederic felten Main CFD Forum 0 April 10, 2003 17:24


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 19:17.