|
[Sponsors] |
November 8, 2010, 17:49 |
Particle fate "Integration error"
|
#1 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,854
Rep Power: 144 |
Time for me to ask a question for a change
I am doing a particle tracking simulation and I am getting almost half my particle tracks end with fate "Integration error". So far I have not been able to find what the problem is. Does anybody know what is causing this or how to fix it?
Code:
====================================================================== | Timestepping Information | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- | Timestep | RMS Courant Number | Max Courant Number | +----------------------+----------------------+----------------------+ | 5.0000E-05 | 1.49 | 16.88 | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ====================================================================== TIME STEP = 865 SIMULATION TIME = 4.3250E-02 CPU SECONDS = 1.095E+05 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COEFFICIENT LOOP ITERATION = 1 CPU SECONDS = 1.095E+05 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- | Equation | Rate | RMS Res | Max Res | Linear Solution | +----------------------+------+---------+---------+------------------+ | U-Mom | 0.98 | 9.3E-05 | 8.2E-03 | 1.6E-02 OK| | V-Mom | 0.99 | 1.0E-04 | 4.8E-03 | 2.6E-02 OK| | W-Mom | 0.98 | 1.1E-04 | 6.6E-03 | 1.8E-02 OK| | P-Mass | 0.97 | 2.2E-05 | 2.7E-03 | 5.1 9.4E-02 OK| +----------------------+------+---------+---------+------------------+ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COEFFICIENT LOOP ITERATION = 2 CPU SECONDS = 1.095E+05 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- | Equation | Rate | RMS Res | Max Res | Linear Solution | +----------------------+------+---------+---------+------------------+ | U-Mom | 0.41 | 3.8E-05 | 3.9E-03 | 4.0E-03 OK| | V-Mom | 0.60 | 6.2E-05 | 4.7E-03 | 4.0E-03 OK| | W-Mom | 0.63 | 6.9E-05 | 3.8E-03 | 4.0E-03 OK| | P-Mass | 0.60 | 1.4E-05 | 2.2E-03 | 9.2 4.3E-02 OK| +----------------------+------+---------+---------+------------------+ ====================================================================== Particle Diagnostics ====================================================================== +--------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Particle Fate Diagnostics | +--------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Particle type | Fate type Particles | +--------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Ink | Entered domain : 2560 | | | Continue from last time step : 10676 | | | Left domain : 1 | | | Collected on walls : 1361 | | | Waiting for next time step : 10669 | | | Integration error : 1205 | +--------------------------------------------------------------------+ |
|
November 10, 2010, 12:25 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Bharath kumar
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 169
Rep Power: 17 |
hi ghorrocks,
the reason may be if the particles trapped in recirculation zone for a long time this kind of error occur otherwise the time step won't suits well for the problem. |
|
November 10, 2010, 17:27 |
|
#3 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,854
Rep Power: 144 |
I see. There are no recirculations where the particles are travelling, but I do have an unusually small geometry. I will look into tolerances on minimum particle movements.
Thanks for the tip! |
|
March 11, 2011, 14:57 |
|
#4 |
New Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 21
Rep Power: 16 |
Hi ghorrocks
Increasing the value of "number of integration steps per element" could help. Integration error problem solved by that way in my case. It appears it's late response for your work but it may help others |
|
March 13, 2011, 06:38 |
|
#5 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,854
Rep Power: 144 |
Thanks for the comment. I had not tried that one.
But unfortunately that piece of work is long finished and I doubt I will get to play with it again. But you never know. |
|
December 13, 2011, 12:03 |
|
#6 | |
Member
Julian Krick
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Guelph
Posts: 88
Rep Power: 17 |
Quote:
mnis = nsipe * "number of elements a particle travels through" Thus, if nispe = 1e3 and mnis = 1e6, a particle can travel trough 1e3 elements, before it "Exceeded Integration Limit". Another reason for a high number of particle loss due to an "Integration Error", may be that the initial velocity of the particles is set to zero. I released particles from a sphere with a velocity of 0 m/s and ca. 50% of the particles got lost due to an integration error. After assigning an initial velocity of 1 m/s, no particles experienced this error.
__________________
grid generation: ICEM CFD 13.0 solver: CFX 13.0 |
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Particle Tracking for ion | Jun | CFX | 2 | August 31, 2010 09:19 |
DPM UDF particle position using the macro P_POS(p)[i] | dm2747 | FLUENT | 0 | April 17, 2009 02:29 |
particle tracking collection tank | Neser | CFX | 1 | June 1, 2006 11:06 |
Particle Trajectory calculation when particle hit | yueroo | FLUENT | 2 | February 28, 2001 05:26 |
Particle Fate | Arturo Ortiz | FLUENT | 4 | September 29, 2000 09:06 |