|
[Sponsors] |
April 28, 2021, 17:01 |
CFD-Post results analysis
|
#1 |
New Member
Edgar
Join Date: Mar 2021
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 5 |
Hello,
I have simulated a radial compressor within ANSYS by firstly using VISTA CCD and consequently transferring the data into Turbomachinery Fluid Flow. Here, BladeGen creates the 3-D model of the radial compressor, turbogrid creates the mesh and finally CFX provides the results. My question is regarding some of the different results that CFD-post automatically generates and wanted to know whats the difference between them. The attached pictures are below. What would be the difference between these 3? (Span 10,50,90 view) https://imgur.com/7WjAX86 https://imgur.com/xFBwElM https://imgur.com/lpfmfNv Also, what do you think of these results? These gave an isentropic efficiency of 86% and a pressure ratio of 4.7 overall but I want to understand whether these velocity distributions along the suction and pressure side are reasonable or they do not look efficient. I will also add a blade-to-blade view image in case its required. https://imgur.com/lGBvNKz Thanks in advance Edgar |
|
April 28, 2021, 19:41 |
|
#2 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,871
Rep Power: 144 |
Please post images directly on the forum. Do not use third party sites. See FAQ: https://www.cfd-online.com/Wiki/Ansy...n_the_forum.3F
About accuracy, see FAQ: https://www.cfd-online.com/Wiki/Ansy..._inaccurate.3F On interpreting your results - I have no idea what you are modelling, what conditions you are modelling or what the images show. This means I cannot make any useful comment about what your results are.
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum. |
|
April 29, 2021, 06:20 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Edgar
Join Date: Mar 2021
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 5 |
Sorry I should have been clearer with my modelling.
I am trying to design a radial compressor that achieves a reasonable isentropic efficiency. The specifications added to Vista CCD are the following: Duty and Aerodynamic Data Tab Overall Pressure ratio :4.5 Mass flow rate : 0.2 kg/s Rotational Speed : 150000 rpm Temperature inlet:293.15K Pressure : 101000 Pa Isentropic Efficiency: 0.8 (Everything else left default) Geometry Tab Hub diameter : 20 mm Shroud Diameter : Optimized diameter Number of vanes : 7 (for both main vane and intervane) (Everything else left default) After setting up Vista CCD, I transferred the data into Turbomachinery Fluid Flow which is a pre-built program within ANSYS that automatically generates the mesh using Turbogrid (it is a hexahedral mesh with 250000 total nodes), consequently, it uses CFX to set the parameters for simulation and finally the results are obtained on CFD-Post. The results I have shown you are obtained within CFD-Post and there are different tabs that are automatically generated. However, I was not sure why there are 3 different types of results (Span 10/50/90) and wanted to know what these referred to. If you need anything else in particular to continue please let me know. Also, do you need me to re-submit the images or can you use those links? |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Post Processing Results: Ansys Workbench 18.2 - Fluent - CFD Post - Porous Body | onlycfd | CFX | 4 | April 29, 2021 04:02 |
Fluent export - CFD Post - Airfoil Results | Wingman | ANSYS | 0 | November 18, 2016 17:36 |
CFD Online Celebrates 20 Years Online | jola | Site News & Announcements | 22 | January 31, 2015 01:30 |
CFD Post. Multiple results comparison | zombiaska | Visualization & Post-Processing | 1 | December 23, 2014 17:06 |
CEL mathematical functions in CFD Post | Jonathan | CFX | 9 | November 5, 2012 09:37 |