|
[Sponsors] |
June 7, 2011, 16:02 |
Hex Plus Body of Influence
|
#1 |
New Member
Andrew
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 15 |
Hello,
I have invested a number of hours (actually days) into ANSYS 13 mesher and have hit a road block. I am modeling fluid flow, typically in cylindrical vessels. I would like to experiment with hex meshing, but am having difficulty. I am only able to get Hex Dominant to work which I understand is not good for CFD. Also, I use body of influence to increase the mesh count around areas of interest but it appears this option is unavailable when using any of the meshing "methods". I can not find any documentation about this. Thanks |
|
June 8, 2011, 11:41 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Simon Pereira
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 2,663
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 47 |
Yea, body of influence is more of a Tetra/Prism thing... Only tetras can be refined so easily.
For CFD Hexa, you should be looking at the sweep or multizone methods.
__________________
----------------------------------------- Please help guide development at ANSYS by filling in these surveys Public ANSYS ICEM CFD Users Survey This second one is more general (Gambit, TGrid and ANSYS Meshing users welcome)... CFD Online Users Survey |
|
June 8, 2011, 12:13 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Andrew
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 15 |
are there alternatives to the body of influence function that can be used with hex?
|
|
June 8, 2011, 12:28 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
Simon Pereira
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 2,663
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 47 |
If your solver (like CFX) requires a conformal mesh (no hanging nodes), ICEM CFD has a refinement option that creates lots of mini CGrids to connect the larger mesh with the finer mesh... This requires a 3 to 1 size transition.
For solvers like Fluent that support hanging node configurations, many hex meshers (ICEM CFD, TGrid, Gambit, etc.) allow 2 to 1 refinement. Otherwise, you can do things like refine a patch on the surface so that the resulting swept mesh is finer, or manually create a topology such that the mesh is finer in certain areas just due to the compressed or converged topology... What you have hit on here is a primary drawback for hexa mesh. Although it is more efficient at a given size, it can be less efficient if you only need refinement in a few key areas.
__________________
----------------------------------------- Please help guide development at ANSYS by filling in these surveys Public ANSYS ICEM CFD Users Survey This second one is more general (Gambit, TGrid and ANSYS Meshing users welcome)... CFD Online Users Survey |
|
June 9, 2011, 16:48 |
|
#5 |
New Member
Andrew
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 15 |
I'm using OpenFOAM solver.
I found that cutcell can get me a decent looking mesh. But I have to use separate bodies with finer meshes in the areas of concern. I can't figure out what to name the faces on the separate bodies so that they can be ignored by OpenFOAM. When examining the .msh file it appears that ANSYS mesher is declaring the faces as walls even though I try naming them internals or interior. Also all the bodies are set to fluid. Any ideas how to name faces in ANSYS mesher so that they remain as internals/interiors after getting exported as a .msh file. |
|
June 20, 2011, 10:45 |
|
#6 |
New Member
Andrew
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 15 |
Figured out my own problem.
The separate bodies can not intersect any other face or body. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[blockMesh] tutorial 2.2 Stress(...) trouble with blockMesh | colinB | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 8 | January 22, 2012 11:32 |
[blockMesh] Blockmesh error - 2D scramjet | ishaninair | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 7 | March 18, 2011 01:14 |
CheckMeshbs errors | ivanyao | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 2 | March 11, 2009 03:34 |
BlockMeshrefineMesh bug | iagmanu | OpenFOAM Bugs | 0 | February 25, 2008 09:49 |
URGENT NEED FOR HELP | msha | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 2 | September 28, 2007 04:16 |