|
[Sponsors] |
November 16, 2011, 05:28 |
buoyantBoussinesqSimpleFoam and kappat
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 138
Rep Power: 17 |
HI OF Users,
I am simulating the flow over a hot board. I have done various Simulations with rhoSimpleFoam and buoyantSimpleFoam. Now I want to start a Simulation with the solver buoyantBoussinesqSimpleFoam. For that I have to specify the kappat, the 'kinematic turbulent thermal conductivity'. But I can´t find any information of how to calculate the initial values and which BC to set. Is there any Information for that? Thanks
__________________
OF - 2.0.0 |
|
November 16, 2011, 08:27 |
|
#2 |
New Member
Alex
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: München
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 15 |
Hello camoesas,
I found the following definition for the turbulent heat conductivity. It is the product of the heat capacity and the turbulent kinematic viscosity of your considered fluid. I found that in the following book (you can find it in google books): Innovative Food Processing Technologies: Advances in Multiphysics Simulation( Kai Knoerzer,Pablo Juliano,Peter Roupas). But I think you don't need to specify it exactly. For the walls you have a wall function and for the "Inlet" you can use the "calculated" boundary conditon. For the "Outlet" it is zeroGradient. I hope this helps. Best regards |
|
November 16, 2011, 10:40 |
|
#3 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 138
Rep Power: 17 |
HI Alex,
Thanks for the hint. I have now for kappat: Inlet: calculated, Outlet: zeroGradient All Walls: kappatJayatillekeWallFunction; and some empty and symmetry patches. But my solition is aborting in the first iteration giving me this message: Quote:
Thanks for any hints I have uploaded the whole case but I had to delete U p files. I have adopted them for initialization from another simulation so they are to large...
__________________
OF - 2.0.0 |
||
November 16, 2011, 13:24 |
|
#4 |
New Member
Alex
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: München
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 15 |
You have to define a reference for the density for the buoyantpressure boundary conditions.
... HOT { type buoyantPressure; rho rhok; value $internalField; } ... By the way, for the inlet it is better to define the pressure as zerogradient. Otherwise your problem is overdetermined. I hope this will fix the problem. Good luck for your simulation! Regards, Alex |
|
November 17, 2011, 09:18 |
|
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 138
Rep Power: 17 |
HI Alex,
thank you very much for going throw my case! And for this valuable solution. Indeed it fixed my simulation. But my pressure inlet is already zeroGradient. Do you mean the inlet for p_rgh?
__________________
OF - 2.0.0 |
|
February 26, 2014, 08:39 |
Les
|
#6 | |
Member
Peter
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 46
Rep Power: 15 |
Quote:
What about LES? Is it still the same way to set up boundary condition for kappat as you said? Or should I do it the way as nuSgs in tutorial cases, that is, to set all boundaries zeroGradient? Best regards Peter |
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
kappatJayatillekeWallFunctionFvPatchScalarField changes between OpenFOAM 171 and 201 | makaveli_lcf | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 21 | February 28, 2014 03:50 |
problem of kappat in buoyantBoussinesqSimpleFoam | jignesh_thaker2007 | OpenFOAM | 0 | October 2, 2011 06:45 |
kappat | maysmech | OpenFOAM | 5 | February 11, 2011 05:41 |
Boussinesq Tutorials | cbritan | OpenFOAM | 1 | December 12, 2010 22:57 |