|
[Sponsors] |
July 2, 2010, 08:12 |
3D axissymmetric problem
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 16 |
hello,
i have to solve a axis-symmetric 3D-problem (cylinder) - magnetohydrodynamic problem coupled with boussinesq-approximation. Is there any way to solve it in OpenFoam without cylindrical coordinates and without the wedge condition, only with a special boundary condition!? So - maybe - through a constant azimuthal (theta direction) component!? But how could i implement such a condition? Thanks a lot. noramat |
|
July 2, 2010, 08:30 |
|
#2 |
New Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Cologne
Posts: 27
Rep Power: 16 |
i'm also a starter at OF and i'm not familiar with magnetohydrodynamics in OF but generally 2D Simulations can be done with wedges
if you want to define a new boundary condition you have to programm and compile it, have a look at: http://www.tfd.chalmers.se/~hani/kurser/OS_CFD_2007/ http://www.tfd.chalmers.se/~hani/kur...yCondition.pdf Implement boundary condition i hope this helps Last edited by marcbest; July 2, 2010 at 08:49. |
|
July 2, 2010, 08:45 |
|
#3 | |
Senior Member
maddalena
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 436
Rep Power: 23 |
Hi,
Quote:
Hope this helps. cheers, mad |
||
July 13, 2010, 17:07 |
|
#4 |
New Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 16 |
thanks for your answers!
now i have another question to wedge-type .. so - wedge-type is used for 2d-axisymmetric problems. Does the wedge-type imply, that all quantities are independent of the angular/azimuthal component phi (constant in phi direction) and that the angular/azimuthal velocity u_phi is zero? If the last fact is not true (u_phi = 0), how could i implement that? Maybe through a special boundary condition again? thanks a lot again! noramat |
|
July 13, 2010, 17:43 |
|
#5 | |
Senior Member
maddalena
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 436
Rep Power: 23 |
Hi Noramat,
I am not sure I understand your question correctly but... Wedge type is 2D. OF does the trick of using a 3D mesh to solve a 2D case, but in reality all your properties are (and remain) constant along the third dimension, which is not solved indeed. Thus I would say yes: Quote:
mad |
||
July 14, 2010, 06:22 |
|
#6 |
New Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 16 |
thanks again!
that's one answer i need but now i'm still not sure because of the other fact.. so i have to solve a axisymmetric problem (zylinder) with the condition that the angular velocity u_phi is zero. but is it realised by wedge-type? thanks! normat |
|
July 14, 2010, 06:53 |
|
#7 |
Senior Member
maddalena
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 436
Rep Power: 23 |
Hi Noramat,
is U_phi the angular velocity? If it is, than u_phi will be zero, since the angular direction is not solved by OF. On the other hand, if you are interested on an angular direction, than your problem is not 2D. Indeed, you have two geometrical directions (radial and axial) + one phisical direction (circonferential, or angular, as you like), thus the problem is 3D. In that case, the wedge bc cannot be applied and you should use a cyclic instead. hope that this makes things clearer. cheers, mad |
|
July 14, 2010, 06:58 |
|
#8 |
New Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 16 |
thanks very much!
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
UDF compiling problem | Wouter | Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming | 6 | June 6, 2012 05:43 |
Incoherent problem table in hollow-fiber spinning | Gianni | FLUENT | 0 | April 5, 2008 11:33 |
natural convection problem for a CHT problem | Se-Hee | CFX | 2 | June 10, 2007 07:29 |
Adiabatic and Rotating wall (Convection problem) | ParodDav | CFX | 5 | April 29, 2007 20:13 |
Is this problem well posed? | Thomas P. Abraham | Main CFD Forum | 5 | September 8, 1999 15:52 |