|
[Sponsors] |
April 14, 2009, 04:28 |
MRF in latest 1.5.x
|
#1 |
Senior Member
BastiL
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 530
Rep Power: 20 |
Dear all,
there have been some changes regarding MRF in 1.5.x. I am not really sure aht the latest benefits are. As far as I understand there is no need to have a seperate facezone and cellzone for the MRF anymore? And patchs within the rotating zone are now rotating as far as the are not explicitely set to non-rotating? Maybe Matthis can comment on this? Thanks? BastiL |
|
April 15, 2009, 03:53 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Mattijs Janssens
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,419
Rep Power: 26 |
Yes, boundary faces inside MRFzones are automatically rotating.
Benefits: - less set-up. Only cellZone needed. - harder to make mistakes in having non-rotating patches inside mrf zones (main reason why it changed) - can have patches with part inside, part outside. |
|
April 15, 2009, 05:45 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
BastiL
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 530
Rep Power: 20 |
||
April 15, 2009, 11:38 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
Francesco Del Citto
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Zürich Area, Switzerland
Posts: 237
Rep Power: 18 |
Yes, right!
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
rotating wall inside of an MRF zone - fixedValue or movingWallvelocity? | evrikon | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 3 | April 30, 2015 04:51 |
Implicit VOF + MRF | Grzegorz | FLUENT | 3 | February 27, 2009 08:11 |
MRF and transient | carno | Siemens | 2 | December 15, 2004 01:26 |
MRF help please | Atul T. Shinde | FLUENT | 1 | December 19, 2002 02:20 |
Moving Mesh and MRF | Romain | FLUENT | 1 | May 16, 2002 04:45 |