CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

Temperature in simpleFoam takes lots of Iterations

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   June 5, 2012, 12:13
Default Temperature in simpleFoam takes lots of Iterations
  #1
New Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 15
okroud is on a distinguished road
Hey Guys,

i added temperature to simpleFoam as described in this Tutorial for icoFoam.
Everything works fine, though the Solution needs a lot of Time since the Solving for T needs about 500 Iterations, which themselves require noticeable more time than the other variables. I've waited nearly a day and it doesn't get better. Is is a large Mesh so i it would be great if anyone had any experience in whether this is preventable or maybe necessary?

The entry in fvSolution is:

T
{
solver BICCG;
preconditioner DILU;
tolerance 1e-7;
relTol 0;
};

The entries in fvSchemes are:

divSchemes
{
div(phi,T) Gauss upwind;
}

laplacianSchemes
{
default Gauss linear corrected;
}


Here an extract of the log-File:

DILUPBiCG: Solving for Ux, Initial residual = 0.00100392, Final residual = 1.55987e-06, No Iterations 3
DILUPBiCG: Solving for Uy, Initial residual = 0.000223085, Final residual = 1.98551e-06, No Iterations 2
DILUPBiCG: Solving for Uz, Initial residual = 0.00409009, Final residual = 2.67272e-06, No Iterations 4
DICPCG: Solving for p, Initial residual = 0.0102603, Final residual = 0.000508878, No Iterations 10
time step continuity errors : sum local = 0.00022309, global = -3.75985e-05, cumulative = -0.0631543
DILUPBiCG: Solving for omega, Initial residual = 1.34598e-05, Final residual = 1.55138e-06, No Iterations 1
bounding omega, min: -55157.8 max: 7.30739e+06 average: 74327.1
DILUPBiCG: Solving for k, Initial residual = 0.00209203, Final residual = 3.94547e-06, No Iterations 3
bounding k, min: -0.000121144 max: 1.54218 average: 0.0210219
DILUPBiCG: Solving for T, Initial residual = 0.000117996, Final residual = 9.23239e-08, No Iterations 527
ExecutionTime = 80799 s ClockTime = 80875 s

This is my first question in this Forum, so i hope everything is fine, thanks for answers!
okroud is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 6, 2012, 04:12
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Christian Lucas
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Braunschweig, Germany
Posts: 202
Rep Power: 18
Chris Lucas is on a distinguished road
Hi,

set "relTol" to "0.1"

Best Regards,
Christian
Chris Lucas is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 6, 2012, 06:09
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 15
okroud is on a distinguished road
Thank you Chris, now it does about 300 Iterations which is already much better!
okroud is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 19, 2012, 01:42
Default Same problem with p
  #4
Member
 
Suranga Dharmarathne
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: TX, USA
Posts: 39
Rep Power: 15
sdharmar is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Lucas View Post
Hi,

set "relTol" to "0.1"

Best Regards,
Christian
DILUPBiCG: Solving for Ux, Initial residual = 0.239894, Final residual = 0.0179294, No Iterations 1
DILUPBiCG: Solving for Uy, Initial residual = 0.179769, Final residual = 0.0125606, No Iterations 1
DILUPBiCG: Solving for Uz, Initial residual = 0.641576, Final residual = 0.0401016, No Iterations 1
DICPCG: Solving for p, Initial residual = 0.0565956, Final residual = 0.00545759, No Iterations 679
time step continuity errors : sum local = 10.8709, global = 0.0357859, cumulative = 1.01927
DILUPBiCG: Solving for epsilon, Initial residual = 0.100542, Final residual = 0.00703845, No Iterations 1
DILUPBiCG: Solving for k, Initial residual = 0.200465, Final residual = 0.0159354, No Iterations 1
ExecutionTime = 246.64 s ClockTime = 250 s

Please let me know how cope up with this.
sdharmar is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 19, 2012, 01:50
Default
  #5
Member
 
Meindert de Groot
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 34
Rep Power: 14
meindert is on a distinguished road
Try using a multi-grid (GAMG) solver for the pressure equation, and have a look at the motorBike tutorial to get an impression on how to use it.
meindert is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 19, 2012, 02:35
Default
  #6
Member
 
Suranga Dharmarathne
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: TX, USA
Posts: 39
Rep Power: 15
sdharmar is on a distinguished road
Meindert,

Thank you for quick reply I'll try this.
sdharmar is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Foam::error::PrintStack almir OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 92 May 21, 2024 08:56
Orifice Plate with a fully developed flow - Problems with convergence jonmec OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 3 July 28, 2011 06:24
Full pipe 3D using icoFoam cyberbrain OpenFOAM 4 March 16, 2011 10:20
Error while running rhoPisoFoam.. nileshjrane OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 8 August 26, 2010 13:50
Error log vw.cfd OpenFOAM 6 August 7, 2009 06:44


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 17:38.