|
[Sponsors] |
August 4, 2009, 07:55 |
stressFemFoam results?
|
#1 |
New Member
J H
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi,
I did the tutorial stressFemFoam (plateHole) with 15dev and after that, i wanted to look at the results with paraFoam but there are no results. Do i have to type in a command in OF to calculate them after running the case? thanks for help |
|
August 6, 2009, 03:33 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Henrik Rusche
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Wernigerode, Sachsen-Anhalt, Germany
Posts: 281
Rep Power: 18 |
Dear Josef,
have you tried foamToVTK? Henrik |
|
August 6, 2009, 06:26 |
|
#3 |
New Member
J H
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi henrik,
yes i did but there are no results to choose the only things that I can chosse are cellID and cellNormals |
|
August 22, 2011, 06:12 |
paraview can't show results from FEMfoam in a tetPointVectorField
|
#4 |
New Member
Sebastian
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 16 |
Hey, i testing the stressFEMfoam tutorial too, and don't see some results in Parafoam or in the VTK version.
but i am sure, we have the results vor the U and se sigmas, i think the problem depents from the tetPointField format of the data. Normal Solvers create the data in the surfaceVectorField or the volVectorField. The streeFEMfoam create the Data in tetPointVectorField or tetPointScalarField. So we use am method in Paraview to read that file an print the points Have somebody an idea to solve the problem ? Sebastian |
|
June 4, 2012, 16:52 |
|
#5 |
New Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 15 |
Hi sebware
Did you manage to find a solution to this? Thanks Sujan |
|
October 31, 2014, 14:08 |
|
#6 |
Member
Christian
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 74
Rep Power: 12 |
foamToVTK seems to work on extend 3.1!
|
|
November 1, 2014, 11:49 |
|
#7 |
Retired Super Moderator
Bruno Santos
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Posts: 10,982
Blog Entries: 45
Rep Power: 128 |
Greetings to all!
Actually, it was the solver stressFemFoam that was updated in commit "a3b9ee8fac50db3decf0715003e3f05dcb819923" on the 10th of April 2014. You can browse the changes made online at the following locations:
Best regards, Bruno |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Different Results from Fluent 5.5 and Fluent 6.0 | Rajeev Kumar Singh | FLUENT | 6 | December 19, 2010 12:33 |
validation of CFD results | andy | FLUENT | 0 | June 13, 2007 14:55 |
Problems with repeating results | Lee | Siemens | 4 | May 26, 2006 04:39 |
CFX cylinder or sphere benchmark results | Mel | CFX | 1 | August 8, 2005 19:47 |
benchmark results | stefan | Siemens | 3 | September 10, 2001 10:48 |