|
[Sponsors] |
November 22, 2011, 12:08 |
|
#21 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 112
Rep Power: 16 |
Quote:
i did the things described above... I load the vtk-file with paraFoam. But regardless of the time step i am in, the color or size .... I choose, I just dont see a thing!! "Zoom to data" does not show anything either. Am I missing something?? Cheers! |
||
November 29, 2011, 04:24 |
layer tracking
|
#22 |
New Member
Paolo
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Taranto, Apulia, Italy
Posts: 26
Rep Power: 15 |
Hi Foamers,
I'm simulating an hopper, and I'd like to track the bulk descent not particle by particle, but as layers of particles, in order to see how the particles starting from any layer move, and where they are during descent. I tried the elevation filter, but color changes obviously when particles move to a lower level, does anyone have any suggestion regarding how to cope with this? |
|
November 29, 2011, 08:03 |
|
#23 |
Senior Member
Gijsbert Wierink
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 383
Rep Power: 18 |
Can you use ranges on the initial particle IDs? This may give you "coloured bands" of particles ...
__________________
Regards, Gijs |
|
November 29, 2011, 16:46 |
|
#24 |
New Member
Paolo
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Taranto, Apulia, Italy
Posts: 26
Rep Power: 15 |
I'll try and let you know thanks
|
|
December 1, 2011, 15:11 |
|
#25 |
New Member
Paolo
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Taranto, Apulia, Italy
Posts: 26
Rep Power: 15 |
Hi Gijs,
I can't do what you said, anyway thanks |
|
August 31, 2012, 06:28 |
Pipeline browser
|
#26 | |
Member
Thomas Wolfanger
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: South West Germany
Posts: 62
Rep Power: 17 |
Dear Takuya,
Quote:
Sorry I can't find the screenshot of the pipeline browser; could you please show the visualisation pipeline? Regards, -Thomas |
||
August 31, 2012, 07:29 |
|
#27 | |
Retired Super Moderator
Bruno Santos
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Posts: 10,982
Blog Entries: 45
Rep Power: 128 |
Greetings Thomas,
Quote:
If that's not what you're looking for, then what exactly are you looking for? Best regards, Bruno
__________________
|
||
August 31, 2012, 08:38 |
ok, I see...
|
#28 |
Member
Thomas Wolfanger
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: South West Germany
Posts: 62
Rep Power: 17 |
Hello Bruno,
maybe I've misunderstood something - I thought Takuya was writing about another method (without converting to VTK and only having time dependent data without particles) than the one mentioned above and to which the screenshot was belonging. If this wasn't the case then please consider this question as not having been asked . I'll take the opportunity and reformulate my actual question: is it possible to animate a bunch of particles (which are not part of the OF solution) to fly through a time dependent flow field? What filters and sources are needed for that? Regards, -Thomas |
|
August 31, 2012, 14:21 |
|
#29 |
Retired Super Moderator
Bruno Santos
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Posts: 10,982
Blog Entries: 45
Rep Power: 128 |
Hi Thomas,
I can only try and answer the first part of your post: maybe what you want is to use the internal OpenFOAM reader instead? Namely to use the file extension ".foam", instead of ".OpenFOAM"? If so, then as of OpenFOAM 2.0, you can run with the following option: Code:
paraFoam -builtin Best regards, Bruno
__________________
|
|
August 31, 2012, 23:59 |
|
#30 |
Super Moderator
Takuya OSHIMA
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Niigata City, Japan
Posts: 518
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 20 |
Thomas,
I was writing about another method (without converting to VTK and only having time dependent data without particles) than the one mentioned above and to which the screenshot was belonging. Yes you can animate a bunch of particles (which are not part of the OF solution) to fly through a time dependent flow field whichever reader you are using (.foam or .OpenFOAM). You just however have to construct a bit complex pipeline as shown in the pipeline browser in the screenshot and fiddle with the parameter settings of each filter (temporal interpolator, particle tracer, particle pathlines, ...). I did not elaborate to show all the settings since they are extensive and strongly case dependent. T |
|
September 4, 2012, 15:37 |
oh oh oh
|
#31 |
Member
Thomas Wolfanger
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: South West Germany
Posts: 62
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi Takuya, Bruno,
now I understand what you mean: I can see the attached screenshot from Takuya when viewing the thread with my machine at home. However, I cannot see it when using my machine at work. Seems I'm looking quite goony now... Sorry for spoiling the thread, regards, -Thomas |
|
September 4, 2012, 16:03 |
|
#32 |
Retired Super Moderator
Bruno Santos
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Posts: 10,982
Blog Entries: 45
Rep Power: 128 |
Hi Takuya and Thomas,
@Thomas: I didn't even remember checking the source of the image... the link is pointing to a Dropbox account, which is probably why your computer at work is blocking it Nonetheless, this was a good exercise to reinforce what was already explained Best regards, Bruno
__________________
|
|
September 24, 2012, 17:21 |
|
#33 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 30
Rep Power: 14 |
Hey all!
I am trying to do some particle tracking on the cavity tutorial, and I tried both methods suggested on this thread (post 2 and 3). I am using Paraview 3.12 and I can't seem to load the lagrangian field after using Code:
foamToVTK http://openfoamwiki.net/index.php/Ma...sing_foamToVTK But it doesn't work either, so it is maybe worth updating? About method 2, with the different filters. I get different warning messages from Paraview, but in the end nothing happens to my figure. Would somebody care posting some more information about the procedure? Lastly, do you guys know any other place besides CFD Online to get some help specifically to Paraview? Thanks!! E. |
|
August 13, 2013, 03:36 |
|
#34 |
Senior Member
Ehsan
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Iran
Posts: 2,208
Rep Power: 27 |
although an old thread but maybe Takoya reads or others can help.
Hi Takoya could you please explain your way by more steps? I see this error when I select ParticleTracer1 after TemporalInterpolator1: Code:
ERROR: In /home/opencfd/OpenFOAM/ThirdParty-dev/ParaView-3.12.0/VTK/IO/vtkOpenFOAMReader.cxx, line 6481 vtkOpenFOAMReaderPrivate (0x1d7e110): Error reading line 19 of /home/ehsan/Desktop/WR_3/0/T: Expected number, string or (, found Temperature ERROR: In /home/opencfd/OpenFOAM/ThirdParty-dev/ParaView-3.12.0/VTK/IO/vtkOpenFOAMReader.cxx, line 6481 vtkOpenFOAMReaderPrivate (0x1d7e110): Error reading line 19 of /home/ehsan/Desktop/WR_3/0/U: Expected number, string or (, found Velocity ERROR: In /home/opencfd/OpenFOAM/ThirdParty-dev/ParaView-3.12.0/VTK/IO/vtkOpenFOAMReader.cxx, line 6481 vtkOpenFOAMReaderPrivate (0x1d7e110): Error reading line 20 of /home/ehsan/Desktop/WR_3/0/k: Expected number, string or (, found turbulentK ERROR: In /home/opencfd/OpenFOAM/ThirdParty-dev/ParaView-3.12.0/VTK/IO/vtkOpenFOAMReader.cxx, line 6481 vtkOpenFOAMReaderPrivate (0x1d7e110): Error reading line 20 of /home/ehsan/Desktop/WR_3/0/omega: Expected number, string or (, found turbulentOmega ERROR: In /home/opencfd/OpenFOAM/ThirdParty-dev/ParaView-3.12.0/VTK/IO/vtkOpenFOAMReader.cxx, line 6481 vtkOpenFOAMReaderPrivate (0x1d7e110): Error reading line 19 of /home/ehsan/Desktop/WR_3/0/p: Expected number, string or (, found Pressure ERROR: In /home/opencfd/OpenFOAM/ThirdParty-dev/ParaView-3.12.0/VTK/Parallel/vtkTemporalStreamTracer.cxx, line 253 vtkTemporalStreamTracer (0x2947770): Input information has no TIME_STEPS set ERROR: In /home/opencfd/OpenFOAM/ThirdParty-dev/ParaView-3.12.0/VTK/Filtering/vtkExecutive.cxx, line 756 vtkPVCompositeDataPipeline (0x2d85fe0): Algorithm vtkTemporalStreamTracer(0x2947770) returned failure for request: vtkInformation (0x7797b60) Debug: Off Modified Time: 670657 Reference Count: 1 Registered Events: (none) Request: REQUEST_INFORMATION FROM_OUTPUT_PORT: 0 FORWARD_DIRECTION: 0 ALGORITHM_AFTER_FORWARD: 1 ERROR: In /home/opencfd/OpenFOAM/ThirdParty-dev/ParaView-3.12.0/VTK/Parallel/vtkTemporalStreamTracer.cxx, line 253 vtkTemporalStreamTracer (0x2947770): Input information has no TIME_STEPS set ERROR: In /home/opencfd/OpenFOAM/ThirdParty-dev/ParaView-3.12.0/VTK/Filtering/vtkExecutive.cxx, line 756 vtkPVCompositeDataPipeline (0x2d85fe0): Algorithm vtkTemporalStreamTracer(0x2947770) returned failure for request: vtkInformation (0x7797b60) Debug: Off Modified Time: 670657 Reference Count: 1 Registered Events: (none) Request: REQUEST_INFORMATION FROM_OUTPUT_PORT: 0 FORWARD_DIRECTION: 0 ALGORITHM_AFTER_FORWARD: 1 ERROR: In /home/opencfd/OpenFOAM/ThirdParty-dev/ParaView-3.12.0/VTK/Filtering/vtkExecutive.cxx, line 756 vtkPVCompositeDataPipeline (0x2d85fe0): Algorithm vtkTemporalStreamTracer(0x2947770) returned failure for request: vtkInformation (0x10288a00) Debug: Off Modified Time: 671201 Reference Count: 1 Registered Events: (none) Request: REQUEST_UPDATE_EXTENT ALGORITHM_BEFORE_FORWARD: 1 FROM_OUTPUT_PORT: 0 FORWARD_DIRECTION: 0 ERROR: In /home/opencfd/OpenFOAM/ThirdParty-dev/ParaView-3.12.0/VTK/Parallel/vtkTemporalStreamTracer.cxx, line 253 vtkTemporalStreamTracer (0x2947770): Input information has no TIME_STEPS set ERROR: In /home/opencfd/OpenFOAM/ThirdParty-dev/ParaView-3.12.0/VTK/Filtering/vtkExecutive.cxx, line 756 vtkPVCompositeDataPipeline (0x2d85fe0): Algorithm vtkTemporalStreamTracer(0x2947770) returned failure for request: vtkInformation (0xb99890) Debug: Off Modified Time: 671863 Reference Count: 1 Registered Events: (none) Request: REQUEST_INFORMATION FROM_OUTPUT_PORT: 0 FORWARD_DIRECTION: 0 ALGORITHM_AFTER_FORWARD: 1 ERROR: In /home/opencfd/OpenFOAM/ThirdParty-dev/ParaView-3.12.0/VTK/Filtering/vtkExecutive.cxx, line 756 vtkPVCompositeDataPipeline (0x2d85fe0): Algorithm vtkTemporalStreamTracer(0x2947770) returned failure for request: vtkInformation (0xb99890) Debug: Off Modified Time: 671910 Reference Count: 1 Registered Events: (none) Request: REQUEST_UPDATE_EXTENT FROM_OUTPUT_PORT: 0 FORWARD_DIRECTION: 0 ALGORITHM_AFTER_FORWARD: 1
__________________
Injustice Anywhere is a Threat for Justice Everywhere.Martin Luther King. To Be or Not To Be,Thats the Question! The Only Stupid Question Is the One that Goes Unasked. |
|
August 16, 2013, 15:02 |
|
#35 | |
Retired Super Moderator
Bruno Santos
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Posts: 10,982
Blog Entries: 45
Rep Power: 128 |
Greetings to all!
Quote:
If you use the official OpenFOAM reader, namely with the extension ".OpenFOAM", you no longer have this problem. Best regards, Bruno
__________________
|
||
November 21, 2013, 14:23 |
Question about particles and dynamic Mesh (AMI Faces)
|
#36 |
Member
Pablo Caron
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina
Posts: 75
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi to all!
I'd like to use the particle tracer option proposed by Takuya in an unsteady problem with moving mesh. As a reference I used the propeller tutorial in pimpleDyMFoam (OF-2.2.x). This case has two regions, one that rotates and the other that remains fixed. Both regions are connected through an AMI face. I successfully used ParaView particles in cases with constant mesh. If I repeat the procedure for this case all particles disapear after leaving the fixed mesh. Has anyone faced this problem? Any idea about how to solve it? Best Pablo |
|
April 3, 2014, 13:09 |
|
#37 | |
New Member
James Feng
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 21
Rep Power: 12 |
Hi, Takuya,
This thread appears to be a few years back; but I found it quite interesting. So, I'd like to learn more about it. Would you or somebody who understand it explain what is actually done here? From what I'm reading here, Takuya was demonstrating a case with particle tracking in the cavity flow field, using the paraFoam (3.9...). But I wonder if this "cavity.Foam" case is the icoFoam tutorial case where only the incompressible flow field is solved. If so, where are the particle data came from? Shouldn't you generate the particle data by computing with a Lagrangian solver? Currently, I'm using OpenFOAM v. 2.2.2 where I found the Lagrangian solver seems to be mostly for the reacting particles such as diesel engine combustion, which takes very long time to compute with many chemical species. But, I'm only interested in the behavior of nonreacting particles carried by gas flow in pipes such as dense gas-solid suspension flow in channels. Is there a relevant OpenFOAM Lagrangian solver available for my case? Thank you very much. fengjq Quote:
|
||
April 23, 2014, 14:04 |
SprayFoam
|
#38 |
Member
yes
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 32
Rep Power: 12 |
Dear openFoamers
I need a solver to visualized a liquid spray. As I see in tutorials of OF, one of solvers I can use is sprayFoam (I need only first 2 steps: spray breakup and spray tracking). Before use the solver sprayFoam, convert the data to foamToVTK and the using the paraview, the tutorial (dieselFoam http://www.tfd.chalmers.se/~hani/kur...oam.pdf) said that I need to open aachenBomb/1.vtk then for the particle tracking the defaultCloud_2.vtk, but in my vtk folder there is no defaultCloud only sprayCloud.vtk so when I open it an try to make a glyph with the conditions of sphere, paraview suddenly end and closed so I cant see any particle tracking. Hopping you help Kind regards |
|
May 27, 2014, 10:13 |
particle path h5part format
|
#39 |
New Member
Paul Van Liedekerke
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 |
Hi all
Is there a way to visualize in paraview a particle path using the H5part format as input ? Thx ! paul |
|
May 27, 2014, 11:07 |
|
#40 |
New Member
Paul Van Liedekerke
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 |
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[OpenFOAM] ParaView ErrOr | soheil nazmdeh | ParaView | 1 | August 17, 2013 08:40 |
injection problem | Mark New | FLUENT | 0 | August 4, 2013 02:30 |
Particle Tracking for ion | Jun | CFX | 2 | August 31, 2010 09:19 |
particle tracking in unsteady flow | peterchen | FLUENT | 1 | July 22, 2010 23:18 |
restarting lagrange (particle tracking) simulation | dbdias | CFX | 0 | September 22, 2007 20:26 |