|
[Sponsors] |
(ICEM)Negative volumes instead of thiner layer |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
August 10, 2009, 07:11 |
(ICEM)Negative volumes instead of thiner layer
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi,
I'm preparing 2-D mesh for a wing in ICEM I need to 7-times decrease thickness of first near-wall layer, because max(y+) is 7 in my result file. But I'm getting negative volume when I set new thickness. Please help me to fix it, thanks in advance! |
|
August 10, 2009, 15:46 |
Kate Moss Thin
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Simon Pereira
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 2,663
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 47 |
There is a known defect (see the release guide) about the quality metrics sometimes calling thin hexas inverted…
If your solver is structured, do the checks in the blocking tab, and if the very thin elements look (visually) ok, proceed to your solver and check it there. If your solver is unstructured, do the checks on the unstructured mesh (Edit Mesh tab)... On the other hand, you could actually be having a problem with the mesh… If so, then I am guessing that you probably have a slight misalignment of parts (curves not aligned with surfaces to the same tolerance as your first cell height) and the mesh is trying to follow too closely. In certain situations, refining the mesh below the scale of the geometry quality can invert the boundary layer in the last element when projection changes from one entity to the other. If that is what you find (visually), setting projection limit can really help. |
|
August 19, 2009, 04:35 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 17 |
Thanks Simon,
I have invented also another method- scale initial geometry 10 times (for example), create mesh for scaled geometry, open the mesh in pre and scale mesh 0.1 to initial size. Correct volume of thin elements keeps at that transformation in CFX-pre |
|
August 20, 2009, 09:45 |
|
#4 |
New Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 17 |
Everithing great is simple
another one solution of this problem is restart ICEM |
|
August 20, 2009, 18:35 |
Reboot the shuttle...
|
#5 |
Senior Member
Simon Pereira
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 2,663
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 47 |
Do you recall that time a few years back when the Space Shuttles computers were acting up and there was a tense 15 minutes while the astronauts had to sit in the dark as the orbiters computers were rebooted? There was some worry about if they would reboot properly, but they did, and then everything was fine.
I often think that as I reboot anything… If it was a good enough solution for NASA… |
|
August 21, 2009, 05:26 |
|
#6 |
New Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 17 |
I'm almost astronaut then, hehe
|
|
October 18, 2023, 17:37 |
|
#7 | |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2022
Posts: 63
Rep Power: 4 |
Quote:
I have exactly the same problem as you. By adjusting the thickness of the first layer near the wall to reach Y+ = 1, negative volume is created for me. How can I fix this problem? Thanks in advance. |
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[Gmsh] Default Faces on Boundary Layer | axel | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 8 | February 17, 2011 08:47 |
To thin boundary layer? | Luk | CFX | 3 | February 27, 2009 04:22 |
errors | Fahad | Main CFD Forum | 0 | March 23, 2004 14:20 |
Boundary Layer Flow Paradox | Wen Long | Main CFD Forum | 3 | September 24, 2002 09:47 |
union of volumes | CHUBBY | FLUENT | 2 | May 4, 2001 07:31 |