|
[Sponsors] |
[ANSYS Meshing] Meshing around sharp trailing edge in CFX |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
November 8, 2013, 00:11 |
Meshing around sharp trailing edge in CFX
|
#1 |
New Member
Tom
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 13 |
Hi Guys
Could anyone tell me how to make the inflation around the sharp trailing edge of an airfoil without letting them skewed? (as shown in the figure below). As my intention is to capture turbulent flow inside the near wall regions of an S814 airfoil, I have set the first cell height to 0.000014 m (y+ = 1) and the turbulent boundary layer thickness to 0.0116 m (using flat plate theory) by using the First layer thickness method. (maximum layers: 28, first layer height: 0.000014, growth rate: 1.2) However, with this defined inflation control cells around the trailing edge (sharp tip) become highly skewed. And I believe that this is the reason that the computational results (lift/drag coefficients) are diverging from the experimental validation. Thanks for any suggestions or advice Tom |
|
November 8, 2013, 03:21 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Stuart
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Portsmouth, England
Posts: 739
Rep Power: 26 |
You may want to increase the maximum angle to 180 (the default is 140). This is found in the global inflation details by setting the advanced option to ON.
What have you done to cause the inflation layer to only really build up on the leading half of the aerofoil? It looks like the stair stepping collison adoidance is being used. Perhaps fixing that will more likely help with the inflation layers around the trailing edge. Also you may want to increase the cell density at the trailing edge. Are you using the Pre-Inflation or Post-Inflation method? |
|
November 8, 2013, 03:54 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Tom
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 13 |
Hi Stuart
Thanks for your advice. It was really helpful!! As I turn 140 to 180 the inflation resolve the entire edges!! By the way, I am only using inflation with First layer thickness method and I did not use stair stepping collison adoidance for sure. Also, I am using pre-inflation for this analysis. Cheers Tom |
|
May 30, 2016, 09:16 |
Maximum Angle confusion
|
#4 |
Member
Marcel Jay
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Berlin
Posts: 52
Rep Power: 12 |
I have some highley skewed elements near sharp edges (about 120°) and I don't know how to improve the inflation layers. Chaging the maximum angle (anything between 90 and 180°) did not change the mesh. It had to be refreshed but it stays exactly the same.
Any idea? Or maybe it's because I don't even understand the definition of it... Code:
The Maximum Angle control determines prism layer growth around angles, and when prisms will adhere (project) to adjacent surfaces/walls. If the inflated mesh involves extruding from one surface and not its neighbor, and the angle between the two surfaces is less than the specified value, the prisms (sides) will adhere (project) to the adjacent wall. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
how to set periodic boundary conditions | Ganesh | FLUENT | 15 | November 18, 2020 07:09 |
Meshing around sharp trailing edge in CFX | ttu004 | CFX | 1 | November 8, 2013 06:48 |
Meshing of a sharp edge orifice with a radius | Moose1231 | STAR-CD | 3 | December 6, 2011 16:32 |
Trouble with sharp trailing edge | Prakash.Paudel | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 4 | August 12, 2011 15:01 |
trailing edge problem | Kuo Wei-Jen | Main CFD Forum | 2 | April 14, 1999 11:09 |